In the ever-evolving healthcare landscape, accurate medical coding is crucial in ensuring proper
reimbursement, regulatory compliance, and efficient healthcare delivery. Two significant branches of
medical coding, namely Profee coding and Inpatient coding, exhibit distinct characteristics and
requirements. Yet, navigating through the vast array of coding guidelines, staying updated with
ever-evolving regulations, and maintaining meticulous attention to detail requires an unwavering
commitment and specialized expertise. Herein lies the crucial role of professional billing and coding
companies, whose comprehensive knowledge, precision, and dedication are indispensable in ensuring
optimal accuracy, compliance, and financial success in this multifaceted realm of healthcare coding.
Nevertheless, understanding the differences between these coding methodologies is essential for
healthcare professionals involved in coding, billing, and revenue cycle management. This article aims to
provide a comprehensive comparison of Profee coding basics versus Inpatient coding basics, shedding
light on their unique features, challenges, and implications.
Inpatient coding and professional fee coding are two distinct coding processes used in the healthcare industry to document and classify medical services provided to patients accurately. While they share some similarities, such as needing a keen review of documentation, following the same coding and privacy guidelines, and many more, there are also significant differences between them.
Inpatient coding primarily pertains to medical services provided to patients who require admission to a hospital or other healthcare facility for a specified period. This form of coding is typically associated with acute care situations, such as surgeries, serious illnesses, or injuries that necessitate intensive medical attention and continuous monitoring.
Inpatient coding focuses on documenting detailed information about a patient’s medical condition, the treatment received, and the resources utilized during their hospital stay.
The codes used are primarily derived from the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision,
and Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) for diagnoses.
However, the selection of the principal diagnosis is determined by the circumstances surrounding the
inpatient admission. According to the Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set (UHDDS), the principal diagnosis
refers to the condition identified as the primary reason for the patient’s admission to the
hospital for treatment.
Along with ICD-10-CM, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Procedure Coding
System
(ICD-10-PCS) is also used for procedures.
This type of coding typically encompasses a broader range of coding elements due to the complexity of inpatient care, including multiple diagnoses, procedures, medications, and treatments provided during a hospital stay.
In some situations, inpatient coding uses different modifiers than other coding systems. For example, Modifiers 73 and 74
The complexity of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs), Complex Documentation, Frequent Updates, etc, are significant challenges.
In inpatient coding, reimbursement is often based on a prospective payment system (PPS) determined by the DRG assigned to a particular case. DRGs are standardized codes that categorize patients with similar clinical characteristics and resource utilization patterns. These DRGs contain different types such as All Patient DRGs (AP-DRG), Medicare DRG (CMS-DRG & MS-DRG), Severity DRGs (S-DRG), Refined DRGs (R-DRG), and International-Refined DRGs (IR-DRG).
PPS assigns a predetermined payment amount for each DRG, taking into account the expected resources required to treat patients within that group. Each DRG is assigned a specific payment rate based on factors such as the patient’s primary diagnosis, procedures performed, comorbidities, and complications. The reimbursement is determined by multiplying the assigned DRG weight by a fixed dollar amount. In this system, the healthcare facility receives a lump sum payment for an inpatient stay, regardless of the costs incurred.
In contrast to inpatient coding, profee coding, also called Professional Fee coding, focuses on the evaluation and management (E&M) services provided by healthcare professionals in an outpatient or office setting. This includes services such as office visits, consultations, preventive care, and follow-up appointments.
Profee coding involves assigning codes that reflect the complexity and intensity of the encounter, considering factors like the patient’s medical history, examination findings, and the level of medical decision-making required.
This type of coding uses HCPCS and CPT codes for accurate reimbursement.
It generally involves a narrower scope of coding, focusing on the evaluation and management of patients, along with specific procedures performed in an outpatient setting.
Different modifiers, such as modifiers 52 or 53, are used. Modifier 24 (E/M specific modifier) is also used, indicating that the physician provided a significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service on the same day as a procedure or other service. Another Profee coding modifier is the “59” modifier, which indicates a distinct procedural service performed during the same encounter.
E/M Code Selection, Unspecified or Inconsistent Documentation, audits, etc are significant challenges.
Each service is assigned a specific code, and reimbursement is based on each code’s relative value units
(RVUs). RVUs consider the physician’s work, practice expenses, and malpractice costs associated with
providing a particular service. The total RVUs are then multiplied by a conversion factor, a fixed
dollar amount, to determine the reimbursement for the provider.
AAPC says that the assigned Relative Value Units (RVUs) for a procedure or service serve to gauge
its
value in relation to other procedures or services. When a service has six total RVUs, the resources
utilized in providing that service are six times greater than those used by a procedure with 1 RVU.
The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 69209, which refers to removing impacted ear wax on
one
side, is associated with a total Relative Value Unit (RVU) of 0.47. This indicates the amount of
resources and effort typically required for the procedure.
In contrast, cleaning out a mastoid cavity, represented by CPT code 69220, is a more complex and
resource-intensive procedure. Medicare assigns a higher total RVU of 2.40 to reflect the additional
resources involved in this treatment.
For a more extensive surgical procedure involving the ear canal, coded as 69150, the total RVU is
significantly higher at 31.26, indicating the extensive nature of the surgery and the substantial
resources required.
Step 1: Codes selected
Coders assign code based on the amount of time and work performed.
Step 2: RVUs earned
Providers will earn a set amount of points called Work Relative Value Units.
Step 3: Payment calculated
RVUs are calculated, and a dollar amount is equated to the total number of RVU points.
Step 4: Payment issued
The provider is given a reimbursement check based on the dollar amount assigned to the total RVU
points.
Understanding the intricacies of inpatient and ProFee coding is essential for accurate documentation, compliance, and maximizing revenue potential. MedsIT Nexus Medical Coding Services offers comprehensive and reliable medical coding solutions, ensuring that your organization receives optimal reimbursements while staying compliant with the ever-changing coding guidelines. Our expert team of certified medical coders understands the complex reimbursement systems and the specific requirements associated with inpatient and ProFee coding. With our cutting-edge technology and extensive industry knowledge, we ensure accurate coding, timely claim submissions, and improved revenue cycles for your organization.
Claim Free Practice Audit
© MedsIT Nexus. All rights reserved 2024. Powered by MeshSq.
